Sonographic Ultrasound Evaluation of Mastalgia and to Determine the Relationship between Breast Duct Diameter and Severity of Mastalgia

Authors

  • Sundus Aziz
  • Amjad Sattar
  • Ayesha Walid
  • Anila Rahim
  • Nasreen Naz
  • Husson Ara

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the breast ultrasound findings in patients with Mastalgia and the relationship between breast duct diameter and severity of Mastalgia.

METHODOLOGY: A prospective cross-sectional study carried out at Dow Institute of Radiology, Dow University of Health Sciences from June-December 2021. Female patients, irrespective of age, presenting with Mastalgia without any prominent finding on clinical examination were included. A fellowship-trained radiologist performed an ultrasound. Data analysis was performed on SPSS 22.0

RESULTS: Total 380 patients were included. The mean age of the patients was 36.3±11.5 years, and the mean VAS score was 3.2±1.2. A total of 234(61.6%) had mild pain, 139(36.6%) had moderate pain and 7(1.8%) had severe pain. The mean duct diameter in patients with Mastalgia was 2.9±3.7 mm, with 220(57.9%) patients having a diameter <2.0 mm and 160(42.1%) having a diameter >2.0 mm. Duct ectasia was found in 161(42.4%). Mastalgia was significantly higher in patients with duct ectasia (p-value <0.001) and in patients with fibrocystic change (p-value <0.001).

CONCLUSION: Duct ectasia, fibrocystic changes, infective/inflammatory changes, and axillary lymphadenopathy were sonographic features of Mastalgia. Mastalgia was significantly higher in patients with duct ectasia, duct diameter >2.0 mm and in patients with fibrocystic changes.

Keywords: Mastalgia, Duct ectasia, fibrocystic changes, breast pain.

References

Mohammed AA. Evaluation of Mastalgia in patients presented to the breast clinic in Duhok city, Iraq: Cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020; 52: 31-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu. 2020.02.012.

Olawaiye A, Withiam-Leitch M, Danakas G, Kahn K. Mastalgia: A review of management. J Reprod Med. 2005; 50(12): 933-9.

Dzoic-Dominkovic M, Ivanac G, Bojanic K, Kralik K, Smolic M, Divjak E et al. Exploring Association of Breast Pain, Pregnancy, and Body Mass Index with Breast Tissue Elasticity in Healthy Women: Glandular and Fat Differences. Diagnostics (Basel). Diagnosis (Basel). 2020; 10(6): 393.

doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10060393.

Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and management of breast pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004; 79(3): 353-72. doi: 10.4065/79.3.353.

Scurr J, Hedger W, Morris P, Brown N. The prevalence, severity, and impact of breast pain in the general population. Breast J. 2014; 20(5): 508-13. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12305. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Ader DN, South-Paul J, Adera T, Deuster PA. Cyclical Mastalgia: prevalence and associated health and behavioral factors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 22(2): 71-6. doi: 10.3109/ 01674820109049956.

Expert Panel on Breast Imaging, Jokich PM, Bailey L, D'Orsi C, Green ED, Holbrook AI et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Pain. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14(5S): S25-S33. doi: 10.1016/j. jacr.2017.01.028.

Arslan M, Küçükerdem HS, Can H, Tarcan E. Retrospective Analysis of Women with Only Mastalgia. J Breast Health. 2016; 12(4): 151-154. doi: 10.5152/tjbh.2016.2944.

Naz N, Sohail S, Memon MA. Utility of breast imaging in Mastalgia. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci. 2010; 9(1): 12-15.

Taydas O, Koc U. Evaluation of the Relationship between Breast Duct Diameter Measured by Ultrasonography and Mastalgia in Postmenopausal Patients. EJMI 2020; 4(2): 195-198. doi: 10.14744/emji.2020.56981.

McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988; 18(4): 1007-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934.

Ferris-James DM, Iuanow E, Mehta TS, Shaheen RM, Slanetz PJ. Imaging approaches to diagnosis and management of common ductal abnormalities. Radiographics. 2012; 32(4): 1009–1030.

doi: 10.1148/rg.324115150.

Tiu CM, Chiou SY, Chou YH, Lai CH, Chiou HJ, Chiang HR et al. Clinical significance of ductal dilatation on breast ultrasonogram. J Med Ultrasound. 2005; 13(3): 127-134.

Holbrook AI. Breast Pain, A Common Grievance: Guidance to Radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020; 214(2): 259-264. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19. 21923. Epub 2019 Dec 4.

Shobeiri F, Oshvandi K, Nazari M. Cyclical mastalgia: Prevalence and associated determinants in Hamadan City, Iran. Asian Pacific J Trop Biomed. 2016; 6(3): 275-8. doi: 10.1016/j. apjtb.2015.12.008.

Makumbi T, Galukande M, Gakwaya A. Mastalgia: prevalence at a sub-Saharan African tertiary hospital. Pain Res Treat. 2014; 2014: 972726. doi: 10.1155/2014/972726.

Alt?ntas Y, Bayrak M. Evaluation of 1294 Female Patients with Breast Pain: A Retrospective Study. Adv Ther. 2018; 35(9): 1411-9. doi: 10.1007/s 12325-018-0769-y. Epub 2018 Aug 9.

Ramalingam K, Srivastava A, Vuthaluru S, Dhar A, Chaudhry R. Duct Ectasia and Periductal Mastitis in Indian Women. Indian J Surg. 2015; 77(Suppl 3): 957-62. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1079-5. Epub 2014 May 8.

Mohammed AA. Mammary duct ectasia in adult females; risk factors for the disease, a case-control study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021; 62: 140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.023.

Nirhale DS, Dhende M, Shingade P, Chavan S, Sonawane T, Kulkarni G. A study on clinical profile and management of Mastalgia. Int Surg J. 2018; 5(5): 1889-93. doi: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj2018 1604.

Clegg-Lamptey JN, Aduful HK, Yarney J, Adu-Aryee NA, Vanderpuye V, Kyereh M et al. Profile of breast diseases at a self-referral clinic in Ghana. West Afr J Med. 2009; 28(2): 114-7.

Shaukat N, Jaleel F. Ultrasound findings in patients with Mastalgia. J Surg Pak Int. 2016; 21(4): 130-3. doi: 10.21699/jsp.21.4.4.

Downloads

Published

21-06-2023

How to Cite

1.
Aziz S, Sattar A, Walid A, Rahim A, Naz N, Ara H. Sonographic Ultrasound Evaluation of Mastalgia and to Determine the Relationship between Breast Duct Diameter and Severity of Mastalgia. J Liaq Uni Med Health Sci [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 21 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];22(02):110-4. Available from: http://121.52.154.205/index.php/jlumhs/article/view/1033

Issue

Vol. 22 No. 02 (2023): Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Submission of a manuscript to the journal implies that all authors have read and agreed to the content of the undertaking form or the Terms and Conditions.

When an article is accepted for publication, the author(s) retain the copyright and are required to grant the publisher the right of first publication and other non-exclusive publishing rights to JLUMHS.

Articles published in the Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & health sciences are open access articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial - Share Alike 4.0 License. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium; provided the original work is properly cited and initial publication in this journal. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. In addition to that users are allowed to remix, tweak and build upon the work non-commercially as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Or, in certain cases it can be stated that all articles and content there in are published under creative commons license unless stated otherwise.