Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Using Laparotomy as the Gold Standard
Keywords:
Diagnostic accuracy, Ectopic pregnancy, Laparotomy, Non-invasive diagnosis, Reproductive Health, Trans vaginal ultrasoundAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS) in detecting tubal ectopic pregnancies compared to laparotomy, which is considered the gold standard for diagnosis
METHODOLOGY: This study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted within the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, from February to August 2017. A total of 223 women aged 15 to 45 years were included in the study. Consecutive patients suspected of having an ectopic pregnancy were enrolled. All participants underwent transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS), followed by laparotomy for the definitive diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of TVUS were calculated based on the comparison with laparotomy findings. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.
RESULTS: The average age of the participants was 29.8 years (SD ± 6.8). Transvaginal Ultrasound detected ectopic pregnancy in 60.1% of patients, while laparotomy identified ectopic pregnancies in 50.2% of patients. The diagnostic accuracy of TVUS was calculated as follows: sensitivity: 90.1%, specificity: 70.3%, positive predictive value (PPV): 75.4%, negative predictive value (NPV): 87.6%
CONCLUSION: Transvaginal Ultrasound, a widely recognized diagnostic tool for ectopic pregnancy, demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity when compared to laparotomy as the gold standard. It serves as an essential radiological tool for the early and accurate diagnosis of tubal ectopic pregnancy, supporting timely clinical decision-making and management.
References
Shehab QJ, Dolloway L, Damra AM, Al Zoubi MS, Albeitawi SN. Negative histology in surgically managed tubal ectopic pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022; 157(3): 719-22.
Akram S. A clinic-demographic study of incidence of ectopic pregnancy and its management. Int J Health Clin Res. 2020; 3(9): 233-8.
Barik S, Malakar A, Laha S. Trends in Ectopic Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India. J South Asian Feder Obs Gynae. 2020; 12(3):172-177. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1787.
Harish KM, Shwetha N, Nalini N. Incidence and risk factors associated with ectopic pregnancy: a prospective study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2021; 10: 703-6.
Leahomschi S, Šrámek J. Tubal ectopic pregnancy with negative histology: case report and review of the literature. Actual Gyn. 2020; 12: 25-28.
Stulberg DB, Cain L, Dahlquist IH, Lauderdale DS. Ectopic pregnancy morbidity and mortality in low-income women, 2004-2008. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(3): 666-71.
Bachmann C, Abele H, Hoopmann M. Placenta Previa et Percreta: a potentially life-threatening condition. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(3): 539.
De Braud LV, Knez J, Mavrelos D, Thanatsis N, Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Risk prediction of major haemorrhage with surgical treatment of live cesarean scar pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 264: 224–31.
Joseph KS, Lisonkova S, Boutin A, Muraca GM, Razaz N, John S et al. Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 230(4): 440.
Tritsch IT , Buca D , Mascio D , Cali G , D'Amico A , Monteagudo A et al. Outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy according to gestational age at diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecology Reprod Biol. 2021; 258: 53-9.
Vieira de Mello P, Bruns RF, Fontoura Klas C, Raso Hammes L. Expectant management of viable cesarean scar pregnancies: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023; 308: 701-7.
Calí G , Timor-Tritsch IE , Forlani F , Palacios-Jaraquemada F , Monteagudo A , Kaelin Agten A et al. Value of first-trimester Ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 55(4): 450-9.
Spong CY, Yule CS, Fleming ET, Lafferty AK, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. The cesarean scar of pregnancy: ultrasound findings and expectant management outcomes. Am J Perinatol. 2024; 41(01): 1445-50.
Lloyd M, Morton J, Teede H, Marquina C, Abushanab D, Magliano DJ et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of implementing a lifestyle intervention during pregnancy to reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023; 66(7): 1223-34.
Richardson A, Gallos I, Dobson S, Campbell BK, Coomarasamy A, Raine-Fenning N. Accuracy of first-trimester Ultrasound in diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy prior to visualization of the yolk sac: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 46: 142-149.
Thapa NB, Dwa YP. Role of transabdominal Ultrasound in detection of ectopic pregnancy. J Coll Med Sci Nepal. 2016; 12(1): 1-4. doi: 10.3126/jcmsn.v12i1.14397.
Young L, Barnard C, Lewis E, Jones M, Furlan J, Karatasiou A et al. The diagnostic performance of Ultrasound in the detection of ectopic pregnancy. NZ Med J. 2017; 130(1452): 17-22.
Dallas J, West W, Mullings A. Evaluation of transabdominal Ultrasound for ectopic pregnancy. West Indian Med J. 1994; 43(1): 20-2.
Chechia A, Koubaa A, Terras K, Bahri N, Makhlouf. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of ectopic pregnancies. A report of 109 cases. Tunis Med. 2000; 78(10): 589-94.
Ahmed M, Ali M. Role of transabdominal Ultrasound in diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Pak J Med Res. 2003; 42: 167-73.
Zinn HL, Cohen HL, Zinn DL. Ultrasonographic diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy: importance of transabdominal imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 1997; 16: 603-7.
Athey PA, Lamki N, Matyas MA, Watson AB Jr. Comparison of transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasonography in ectopic pregnancy. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1991; 42(5): 349.
Braffman BH, Coleman BG, Ramchandani P, Arger PH. Emergency department screening for ectopic pregnancy: A prospective study. Radiology. 1994; 19: 792-802.
Shalev E, Yarom L, Bustan M, Weiner WE, Ben-Schlomo I. Transvaginal sonography as the ultimate diagnostic tool for the management of ectopic pregnancy-experience with 840 cases. Fertil Steril. 1998; 69(1): 62-5.
Naseem I, Bari V, Nadeem N. Multiple parameters in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005; 55(2): 74-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission of a manuscript to the journal implies that all authors have read and agreed to the content of the undertaking form or the Terms and Conditions.
When an article is accepted for publication, the author(s) retain the copyright and are required to grant the publisher the right of first publication and other non-exclusive publishing rights to JLUMHS.
Articles published in the Journal of Liaquat University of Medical & health sciences are open access articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial - Share Alike 4.0 License. This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium; provided the original work is properly cited and initial publication in this journal. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. In addition to that users are allowed to remix, tweak and build upon the work non-commercially as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. Or, in certain cases it can be stated that all articles and content there in are published under creative commons license unless stated otherwise.
