Maternal Risk Factors in Predicting Pregnancy Risk Levels Using the PRESMIL Application

Authors

  • Rubiati Hipni
  • Zakiah Zakiah
  • Isrowiyatun Daiyah

Keywords:

PRESMIL, Risk Prediction, Risk Prevention, Pregnant Women, Maternal Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze various factors related to pregnancy risks among pregnant women.

METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted at six health centres (Sungai Besar Community, Guntung Manggis Community, Landasan Ulin Timur Community, Cempaka Community Health Centre, Pemulangan Dalam Community Health Centre, Tambarangan Community Health Centre) in South Kalimantan from April to November 2025, and used a cross-sectional design. The study area had a total of 133 pregnant women. Simple random sampling was used. Using the Slovin formula, 100 participants were selected. SPSS and the chi-square test were used to analyze data collected via a questionnaire. PRESMIL is a scientifically validated mobile pregnancy risk screening application (S-CVI/Mean 0.94; Cronbach's alpha 0.75). This application effectively identifies risk factors for pregnancy complications, is easily accessible, integrates with community health centre documentation systems, and is evidence-based, supporting early detection of high-risk pregnancies in Indonesia.

RESULTS: The findings show that several factors are closely related to pregnancy, including age, parity, and pregnancy interval, each with a p-value of 0.000. This is not much different from factors such as a history of cesarean delivery, miscarriage, fetal abnormalities, and anemia, with p-values ??of 0.003; 0.001; 0.007; and 0.005 respectively.

CONCLUSION: It was concluded that the PRESMIL application could assess the risk of pregnancy and provide preventive measures to reduce the risk of pregnancy.

References

1. Wei Y, Luo H, Liu X, Sun G, Liu J, Wei X et al. Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Dec 30; 25(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08456-5.

2. Mulatu S, Mekonnen GB, Tsehay YT, Mamo ST, Mulatu G, Messelu MA et al. Early antenatal care (ANC) booking and associated factors among pregnant women attending ANC services at public health facilities in Bahir Dar City Administration, Northwestern Ethiopia, 2023: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Nov 24; 25(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-08450-x.

3. Rajbanshi S, Norhayati MN, Nik Hazlina NH. High-risk pregnancies and their association with severe maternal morbidity in Nepal: A prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28; 15(12): 1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244072.

4. Arsenault C, Mfeka-Nkabinde NG, Chaudhry M, Jarhyan P, Taddele T, Mugenya I et al. Antenatal care quality and detection of risk among pregnant women: An observational study in Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and South Africa. PLoS Med. 2024 Aug 27; 21(8): 1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004446.

5. Bhagat P, Kaur J. Prenatal prognostics: Validating high-risk pregnancy predictions for maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Sep; 14(1): 1–8. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1684_24.

6. Pangesti W, Sasongko E, Pribadi A, Hilmanto D. Evaluation of Risk Factor Screening Using the Ministry of Health's Scoring System for the Incidence of Early-Onset Preeclampsia in Primary Health Service. Int J Womens Health. 2025 Nov; 17(11): 4815–22. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S521259.

7. Åberg F, Männistö V, Asteljoki J, Salomaa V, Jula A, Lundqvist A et al. Evidence-based criteria for identifying at-risk individuals requiring liver disease screening. Hepatol Commun. 2025 Apr; 9(4): 1–13. doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000679.

8. Jameel M, Iftikhar S, Sadia, Abbas S, Rasul FS, Karim SA, et al. Frequency of Short Inter-Pregnancy Interval in Neonatal Morbidities. PJMHS. 2023; 17(8): 26–8. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs202317826.

9. Munir N. Assessing the Prevalence and Predictors of Short Birth Spacing and Its Association With Pregnancy Outcomes in Pakistani Women. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023; 17(07): 91–3. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs202317791.

10. Marozio L, Picardo E, Filippini C, Mainolfi E, Berchialla P, Cavallo F et al. Maternal age over 40 years and pregnancy outcome: a hospital-based survey. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2019; 32(10). doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1410793.

11. Ni W, Gao X, Su X, Cai J, Zhang S, Zheng L et al. Birth Spacing and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Dose–response Meta?analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023; 102(12): 1618–33. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14648.

12. Kuppusamy P, Prusty RK, Kale DP. High-risk pregnancy in India: Prevalence and contributing risk factors – a national survey-based analysis. J Glob Health. 2023; 13. doi: 10.7189/JOGH.13.04116.

13. Dai J, Shi Y, Wu Y, Guo L, Lu D, Chen Y et al. The interaction between age and parity on adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1056064.

14. Diana S, Wahyuni CU, Prasetyo B. Maternal complications and risk factors for mortality. J Public Health Res. 2020; 9(2). doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1842.

15. Keats EC, Oh C, Chau T, Khalifa DS, Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Effects of Vitamin and Mineral Supplementation During Pregnancy on Maternal, Birth, Child Health and Development Outcomes in Low? and Middle?income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell System Rev. 2021; 17(2). doi: 10.1002/cl2.1127.

16. Krištúfková A, Basheer N, Koprdova K, Lieskovsky M, Fresser M, Žilka N. Micronutrient Dynamics and Deficiency Risk Across Pregnancy and Postpartum in a Slovak Cohort. PLoS One. 2025;20(9):e0331125. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0331125

17. Liu Q, Yang H, Sun X, Li G. Risk factors and complications of small for gestational age. Pak J Med Sci. 2019; 35(5). doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.5.253.

18. Lee SU, Park JY, Hong S, Wie JH, Shin JE, Choi SK et al. Risk factors for pregnancy-associated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregn Childbirth. 2024; 24(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06402-5.

19. Abecassis A, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Miodownik S, Pariente G. Risk factors for early postpartum hemorrhage: A retrospective, population-based, cohort analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2024; 166(2). doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15414.

20. Mustary M, Ansariadi, Syam A, Riskiyani S, Erika KA, Moedjiono AI et al. Preeclampsia: Etiology, Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, Impact and Prevention: A Narrative Review. Iran J Public Health. 2024; 53(11): 2392–403. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i11.16941.

21. Angraini DI, Sulastri D, Hardisman, Yusrawati. Angraini Model as Effort to Early Detection of Chronic Energy Deficiency in Pregnancy. Kemas. 2023; 19(1): 102–12. doi: 10.15294/kemas.v19i1.42212.

22. Ramakrishnan R, Rao S, He JR. Perinatal health predictors using artificial intelligence: A review. Women's Health. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2021. doi: 10.1177/17455065211046132.

23. Harindra LDO. Web-Based Application Development of Early Detection of High-Risk Maternal Referral System in the Islands Region (SIDILAN) in South Bangka Regency. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020. doi: 10.37506/ijphrd.v11i7.10098.

24. Ramadhan FF, Pudji A, Mak'ruf MR, Misra S. ANC Bed for Preeclampsia Early Detection Using Web System. Indonesian J Electronics, Electromedical Engineering, and Medical Informatics. 2023; 5(3). doi: 10.35882/ijeeemi.v5i3.288.

25. Kesuma MR, Andika B, Halim J. E-Healthcare Mendiagnosa Penyakit Diabetes Gestasional Pada Ibu Hamil Dengan Menggunakan Metode Teorema Bayes. Jurnal CyberTech. 2020; 1978–6603(x).

Downloads

Published

30-10-2026

How to Cite

1.
Hipni R, Zakiah Zakiah, Isrowiyatun Daiyah. Maternal Risk Factors in Predicting Pregnancy Risk Levels Using the PRESMIL Application. J Liaq Uni Med Health Sci [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 30 [cited 2026 Oct. 31];25(05):351-7. Available from: http://121.52.154.205/index.php/jlumhs/article/view/1883

Similar Articles

<< < 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.